AI Law - International Review of Artificial Intelligence LawCC BY-NC-SA Commercial Licence ISSN 3035-5451
G. Giappichelli Editore

04/07/2026 - Supreme Court: AI‑generated or hallucinated precedents can void judgments — key ruling explained

argument: Notizie/News - Civil Procedure Law

Source: Instagram

The Supreme Court held that reliance on non‑existent, AI‑generated, or hallucinated judicial precedents vitiates adjudication, renders the affected decision void in law, and warrants setting that decision aside. The post identifies the matter as Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. and attributes the report to Malika Bhola. The Instagram account scctimes_ shared this conclusion and flagged the development with hashtags including #SupremeCourt, #AIGeneratedJudgments, #AIHallucination and references to IBC and NCLT reform.

The post invites readers to obtain the full story via the SCC OnLine App (link in bio) and includes download links for Android and iOS within the caption. The content is presented as a brief legal update on Instagram and contains promotional language directing users to the SCC Online app for expanded coverage. No further procedural details, court reasoning, or final order text are included in the extracted post.