AI Law - International Review of Artificial Intelligence LawCC BY-NC-SA Commercial Licence ISSN 3035-5451
G. Giappichelli Editore

01/01/2026 - Critical Gaps in International AI Governance and Crisis Response

argument: Notizie/News - Administrative Law

Source: Time

Time magazine presents a critical analysis of the global landscape of artificial intelligence governance as 2025 draws to a close, arguing that the world remains dangerously unprepared for a large-scale "AI emergency." Despite the proliferation of regional regulations like the EU AI Act and national frameworks in the US and China, there is a distinct lack of a coordinated international protocol for managing systemic failures or autonomous escalations. The article highlights that most current laws are designed for steady-state monitoring and compliance but fail to address rapid-onset crises, such as widespread algorithmic bias in financial markets or the catastrophic failure of AI-integrated critical infrastructure.

The analysis further discusses how geopolitical competition is actively hindering the creation of shared safety standards. Nations are often more focused on achieving technological dominance than on establishing collective guardrails, leading to a fragmented regulatory environment where high-risk AI models can be deployed in "safety havens." Experts cited in the piece call for the establishment of a global AI emergency response task force and mandatory fail-safe mechanisms for frontier models. The conclusion emphasizes that without immediate investment in crisis-ready governance, the rapid deployment of increasingly autonomous systems could lead to irreversible social and economic disruption before any meaningful human intervention can occur.