Source: O'Shea Dyer Solicitors

O'Shea Dyer Solicitors, an Australian law firm, outlines four critical reasons why individuals should avoid using Artificial Intelligence for advice and assistance in family law matters. The first reason highlighted is the lack of empathy and emotional intelligence. Family law cases are deeply personal and emotionally charged, requiring a nuanced understanding of human relationships that AI cannot replicate. A human lawyer can provide essential emotional support and tailor advice to the specific emotional context of a client's situation, which is crucial for navigating difficult processes like divorce or child custody disputes.

The second reason is the significant risk of receiving inaccurate or outdated legal information. AI models are trained on vast datasets but may not have access to the most recent legislative changes or case law, particularly those specific to Australian jurisdictions. This can lead to flawed advice that could severely damage a person's case. Thirdly, the article raises serious concerns about confidentiality and data privacy, as feeding sensitive personal information into a public AI platform could expose it to breaches. Finally, the firm argues that AI cannot provide strategic, tailored advice. Every family law case is unique, and an experienced lawyer develops a strategy based on the specific facts, financial details, and personalities involved—a level of customized thinking that is beyond the current capabilities of AI.