Source: SpringerLink

SpringerLink provides the abstract for a book chapter by Tania Sourdin titled "AI-Based Tools as Judicial Assistants and Robot Judges in Civil and Criminal Proceedings." The chapter explores the increasing sophistication and use of artificial intelligence tools within the judicial system, categorizing them into two main roles: AI-based judicial assistants and "robot judges." AI judicial assistants are defined as tools that support human judges by performing tasks such as legal research, evidence analysis, and case management, thereby enhancing the efficiency and quality of the judicial process. These tools augment, rather than replace, human decision-making.

In contrast, the concept of a "robot judge" refers to a more autonomous AI system capable of making binding legal decisions, particularly in lower-stakes civil matters such as small claims or traffic violations. The abstract indicates that the chapter will analyze the current landscape of these technologies, examining their application in various jurisdictions in both civil and criminal contexts. It will also delve into the significant ethical, legal, and practical challenges associated with their implementation. Key issues to be discussed include ensuring procedural fairness, mitigating algorithmic bias, maintaining judicial independence, and determining the appropriate level of human oversight required for these powerful new tools in the administration of justice.