AI Law - International Review of Artificial Intelligence LawCC BY-NC-SA Commercial Licence ISSN 3035-5451
G. Giappichelli Editore

10/09/2025 - Clark County Police Reject AI for Report Writing, Citing Accuracy Risks (USA)

argument: Notizie/News - Public Law

Source: The Columbian The Columbian reports that law enforcement agencies in Clark County, Washington, are deliberately choosing not to adopt artificial intelligence tools for writing official police reports, despite the availability of such technology. Officials from the Clark County Sheriff’s Office and the Vancouver Police Department have expressed significant reservations about using AI for this critical task. Their primary concerns revolve around the absolute need for accuracy and the potential for AI systems to introduce errors or misinterpret nuances in an officer's account of an incident. These documents form the foundation of criminal cases, and any inaccuracies could have severe consequences in court.

A crucial reason for this reluctance is the importance of an officer's personal recollection and authorship for courtroom testimony. Defense attorneys frequently scrutinize police reports and question officers on their specific details. An officer must be able to testify confidently about what they wrote and observed. If a report were generated by AI, it could undermine the officer's credibility on the stand, as they would not be testifying from their own, unfiltered memory and documentation of events. The Washington State Patrol has echoed this sentiment, confirming its own policy against using AI for generating reports. The decision highlights a cautious and considered approach by these agencies, prioritizing legal integrity and the reliability of human officers over the potential efficiency gains offered by automation in this specific area of police work.