argument: Notizie/News - AI in Judicial Activities
Source: Mail & Guardian
This opinion article argues that, as artificial intelligence becomes more prevalent in South Africa’s legal system, human beings must remain the ultimate decision-makers in all legal proceedings. The author warns that fully automated justice would undermine core values such as fairness, accountability, and the right to a fair hearing.
The article discusses risks associated with overreliance on AI, including algorithmic bias, lack of empathy, and opacity in decision-making. It stresses that AI should serve as an assistive tool, not a substitute for human judgment, particularly when legal outcomes affect individual rights and liberties.
The piece concludes by urging the legal profession and policymakers to enshrine robust safeguards in law and court procedure, guaranteeing human oversight, transparency, and the protection of fundamental rights as the use of AI in justice continues to expand.