Source: Cryptopolitan

The article critiques the EU AI Act, arguing that it does not adequately protect artists and creators from the risks posed by artificial intelligence. Many artists and content creators feel that the legislation favors AI developers and tech companies while failing to ensure fair compensation and copyright protection for human-made works.

One of the primary concerns is that AI systems, which generate art, music, and written content, often rely on vast datasets that include copyrighted material. Artists argue that the EU AI Act does not go far enough in requiring transparency on how training data is sourced or in providing mechanisms for artists to opt out of AI model training.

The article highlights the growing frustration within the creative community, which fears losing control over their intellectual property. Unlike stricter copyright regulations, the AI Act primarily focuses on transparency and accountability but lacks strong enforcement measures for copyright holders.

Some industry advocates are calling for amendments to the AI Act to include clearer provisions on intellectual property rights, royalties for AI-generated content, and stricter penalties for companies that misuse copyrighted material. Others fear that without stronger protections, the creative industry in Europe could suffer long-term economic consequences.

The debate over AI and copyright is not limited to Europe, as similar discussions are taking place globally. The article concludes by noting that the EU AI Act may need future revisions to strike a better balance between innovation and the rights of creators.