Source: The420.in

The420.in provides detailed coverage of the developing legal scandal at the Supreme Court of India, focusing on the specific context of the Deepak Raheja v. Omkara Asset Reconstruction insolvency case. The report emphasizes the sheer scale of the alleged fabrication, noting that more than 100 case citations included in a legal rejoinder are suspected to be the result of AI hallucinations. This massive reliance on non-existent case law prompted immediate concern from the Bench, which orally observed the gravity of misleading the court through technological negligence or deceit. The opposing counsel successfully demonstrated that many of the cited "precedents" simply did not exist in any legal reporter.

The article contextualizes this event within the broader struggle of courts to adapt to the generative AI era, where tools like ChatGPT can invent convincing but false narratives. The controversy arose after the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted insolvency petitions against Gstaad Hotels, leading the promoter to appeal. In his defense, the reliance on what appears to be unverified AI output has now jeopardized his legal standing. The Supreme Court's willingness to investigate this specific aspect signals a critical enforcement of professional standards, warning litigants that the convenience of AI cannot supersede the duty of accuracy and truthfulness in legal pleadings.