Source: Hill Publisher

Hill Publisher presents a scholarly comparative analysis of artificial intelligence legal frameworks in selected jurisdictions, including the United States, European Union, China, and India. The study examines how each country or region addresses AI-related challenges through legislation, ethical principles, risk classification, and data governance.

It notes that the EU leads in detailed regulatory frameworks, focusing on risk mitigation and human rights. The U.S. approach is more sector-specific and innovation-driven, while China prioritizes AI as a strategic national asset, combining tight state control with rapid development. India is highlighted for its emerging regulatory environment, still largely guided by non-binding guidelines and policy drafts.

The paper emphasizes the global divergence in how AI risks are interpreted and managed, and calls for more international coordination to avoid regulatory fragmentation that could hinder both innovation and rights protection.