Source: Maastricht University

The article from Maastricht University discusses the recent decision by the European Union to withdraw the proposed AI Liability Directive, which aimed to establish clear rules for holding AI developers and users accountable for damages caused by AI systems. The withdrawal has sparked debates on the future of AI regulation in the EU, particularly regarding liability and consumer protection.

Critics argue that the directive's withdrawal leaves a significant gap in ensuring accountability for AI-related harm, potentially exposing consumers to risks without sufficient legal recourse. The article explores the challenges of defining liability in cases involving complex AI systems, especially when it comes to proving causation and fault. It also highlights the need for alternative regulatory approaches, such as revising existing liability frameworks or introducing sector-specific regulations. The EU's decision reflects broader uncertainties about balancing innovation with adequate protection for consumers and businesses.